The White House has dismissed ‘Signalgate’ as a smear campaign amid media allegations of a push to oust the national security adviser
US Vice President J.D. Vance and other senior officials suggested that President Donald Trump fire National Security Adviser Mike Waltz during a private discussion about an incident in which Waltz accidentally included a reporter in a confidential chat about US military strikes in Yemen, according to anonymous insider sources cited by Politico.
Two individuals said to be familiar with the closed-door meeting at the White House on Wednesday night told Politico that Vance, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and personnel chief Sergio Gor advised Trump that it might be time to cut Waltz loose.
The president reportedly agreed that Waltz had “messed up,” but ultimately decided against dismissing him.
“Like hell he’d give the liberal media and pearl-clutching Democrats a win,” Politico wrote on Friday, citing one insider as saying the administration does not “want to give the press a scalp.”
The leak, first reported by The Atlantic on Monday, revealed that Waltz had inadvertently invited editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg to a confidential Signal chat where senior administration officials were discussing airstrikes on Houthi militants in Yemen. Waltz has taken “full responsibility” for the incident, calling it “embarrassing” in a Fox News interview and attributing the inclusion to a technical glitch.
Trump has largely downplayed the controversy, dismissing the media response as a “witch hunt” and questioning the reliability of Signal. He stressed that no classified information was compromised and praised the military operation as “unbelievably successful.”
“I don’t fire people because of fake news and because of witch hunts,” Trump told NBC News in an interview Saturday. He reiterated he still has full confidence in both Waltz and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who was accused of sharing sensitive information in the Signal chat.
Vance has publicly aligned himself with the president’s decision. On Friday, he brought Waltz along for a high-profile trip to Greenland, where he dismissed media speculation and defended the national security team.
“If you think you’re going to force the president of the United States to fire anybody, you’ve got another thing coming,” Vance told reporters.
Nevertheless, Politico claimed that Waltz’s position remains tenuous, citing one Trump ally who said, “They’ll stick by him for now, but he’ll be gone in a couple of weeks.” Other unnamed sources described longstanding personal and political tensions, alleging that Waltz has alienated colleagues by overstepping boundaries and acting more like a principal than a staffer.
A spokesman for Waltz, Brian Hughes, pushed back against the narrative, calling the reports “gossip from people lacking the integrity to attach their names.” He added that Waltz “serves at the pleasure of President Trump” and continues to have the president’s support.
