The Russian foreign minister spoke to Channel 1 following 12 hours of negotiations between Moscow and Washington in Saudi Arabia
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has addressed a sweeping range of international issues in an interview – broadcast early on Wednesday. He focused heavily on what he described as constructive signals from US President Donald Trump and his team, while simultaneously criticizing Western governments for what he called efforts to sabotage any momentum toward a peaceful resolution in Ukraine.
Below are the key takeaways from Lavrov’s appearance on Russia’s Channel 1, which was broadcast in the early hours of Wednesday morning following a marathon 12-hour negotiation session between Russian and American representatives in Riyadh on Monday.
Kiev is fundamentally untrustworthy
Lavrov asserted that the “Kiev regime” is not only breaking all agreements but doing so in ways that seem deliberately provocative. He recalled how Kiev publicly agreed to a 30-day ceasefire following the March 11 meeting with US officials in Jeddah, yet on the very same day launched a record 340 drone attacks on central Russia, including Moscow, targeting civilian infrastructure.
Zelensky speaks out on US-Ukraine talks in Saudi Arabia The foreign minister emphasized that this was not an isolated case, but part of a larger pattern. From violations of the Minsk Agreements to broken promises made during Turkish-brokered discussions in 2023, Lavrov painted a picture of a fundamentally untrustworthy government that uses negotiations as a tactical pause – only to regroup and escalate.
“Every time a ceasefire is suddenly declared, Ukraine agrees to it solely because at that specific historical moment it found itself in a hopeless situation on the battlefield. As soon as there was a pause, immediately within weeks or a couple of months, this ceasefire was grossly violated,” the top diplomat stated.
Moscow believes that only a “direct order issued by Washington” can compel Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky to observe any potential truce. “Our position is simple… We cannot take this man’s word for it,” Lavrov said.
EU undermining Trump’s efforts
Lavrov accused European powers – specifically France and the UK – of deliberately undercutting President Trump’s diplomatic overtures. According to Lavrov, European leaders have pushed for so-called “peacekeeping missions” to be deployed in Ukrainian-controlled territories in a bid to lock in Western influence and obstruct a neutral, negotiated settlement.
EU ‘contradicting’ US on Ukraine – Lavrov “When the ‘remainder’ of Ukraine, if it persists in any form, is taken under the control of NATO countries’ security forces (no matter under what flag), no one says they will then strengthen democracy in the remaining territory. No one says they will repeal the racist, Russophobic laws that exterminate everything Russian,” Lavrov said.
He described this as an effort to undermine Washington’s role in a future settlement and to preserve a hardline anti-Russia posture, regardless of who is in the White House. Lavrov said these actions run counter to US de-escalation efforts, insisting that by pressing for a long-term NATO presence in Ukraine, Europe is seeking to anchor the conflict’s status quo and make any Russian-American compromise more difficult.
European militarization & seeking strategic defeat of Russia
Lavrov warned that Kiev’s European backers remain fully committed to a strategy of “strategic defeat” for Russia, comparing current Western behavior to the united fronts seen during the Napoleonic Wars and World War II. He noted that countries like Germany, France, and the UK are ramping up military spending while neglecting their own domestic economic challenges.
: Rubio accuses ‘other countries’ of blocking peace in Ukraine
He cautioned that the European call to arm Ukraine indefinitely – even amid discussions of a ceasefire – reveals that Brussels is more interested in using Ukraine as a proxy battleground than in pursuing peace. EU leaders, he argued, are “remilitarizing Europe” under the illusion that Russia can be isolated and weakened.
Biden’s colossal mistake
Lavrov was blunt in his criticism of former US President Joe Biden’s foreign policy, particularly with regards to Ukraine. He argued that Biden’s insistence on NATO expansion, coupled with a refusal to engage with Russia’s security concerns, had triggered the current crisis. Lavrov said Biden ignored repeated warnings from Moscow – some dating back to Putin’s 2007 Munich speech – and instead pursued a confrontational, ideological agenda.
He reiterated Russia’s view that Biden weaponized the US dollar and global financial system, turning them into tools of coercion. This strategy, Lavrov claimed, backfired, pushing countries to seek alternatives to the dollar and spurring support for BRICS-based platforms.
“Donald Trump, even before he became US president, said after the elections that Joe Biden made a colossal mistake – if not a crime – when he began to use the dollar to ‘punish’ certain countries. As a result, not only those whom he tried to punish were deprived of the opportunity to use it, and others began to take a closer look,” Lavrov said.
Trump’s focus on US national interests
In contrast, Lavrov was relatively optimistic about the direction of US foreign policy under Trump, praising what he called a realistic, interest-driven approach. He emphasized that Trump’s team acknowledges that great powers may have conflicting interests but must find ways to avoid direct confrontation.
Lavrov said Trump’s emphasis on national interest over ideological campaigns represents a welcome shift. He added that the Trump administration recognizes Russia’s security needs, and that mutual respect is the only path forward.
Restoring mutually beneficial Moscow–Washington ties
Lavrov made it clear that Moscow is open to restoring ties with Washington – but not under the Biden-era framework. Dialogue, he insisted, must be mutually respectful and based on enforceable agreements. Quoting President Ronald Reagan, Lavrov said: “Trust, but verify. We won’t forget that.”
: White House reveals details of US-Russia talks in Riyadh
“We do not have any illusions… But we have a consensus that Trump’s team wants to make these relations mutually beneficial where possible, mutually respectful where we disagree, and not allow the disagreements between the two largest nuclear powers to escalate into a confrontation,” Lavrov added, calling US-Russia ties under Biden an “anomaly,” now giving way to a return to “normalcy.”
Ukraine–Greenland parallels
US annexation of Greenland ‘will happen’ and NATO could ‘get involved’ – Trump In one of his more striking analogies, Lavrov invoked Greenland to explain Ukraine’s strategic value to Russia. He recalled how Trump had repeatedly floated the idea of annexing Greenland for US security reasons, arguing that Ukraine is vastly more important to Russia’s national security than Greenland is to the United States.
“We talked about this with the Americans… Such comparisons are very important for them. For the legitimate security interests of Russia, Ukraine is several orders of magnitude more important than Greenland is for ensuring US security. They understand that comparison,” Lavrov said.
Lavrov also criticized Western geopolitical double standards, noting NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte’s hypocrisy in defending Ukraine’s territorial integrity while downplaying US interests in Greenland, a Danish territory.
Strategic arms control involving China
On strategic arms control, Lavrov maintained that the question of expanding treaties like New START to include China is entirely up to Beijing. He also emphasized that China’s nuclear arsenal is far smaller than those of Russia or the US, and by the same logic any expansion of talks must also include nuclear-armed NATO members like France and the UK.
Lavrov reaffirmed Russia’s support for the Reagan-Gorbachev principle that “a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought,” but said a serious resumption of arms control talks with Washington would require a return to mutual respect and a reversal of the current “enemy doctrine” in US and NATO policy toward Russia.
